This week I’re been looking at a variety of sources, from Peter Slade, Dorothy Heathcote, Augusto Boal, Peter Brook, Ann Cattanach, Tony Qiubell, Anne Chesner, Brian Way, Gavin Bolton, Suzanne Langer, and Richard Hornby and Peter O’Connor. All have different approaches to drama, theatre, child drama and specifically for some drama for children with special needs.
Last Satuarday I was invited by Dr Peter O’Connor to his home in Auckland after a previous meeting that Paula arranged for me. Peter has his own Applied Theatre company in New Zealand, that are very successful and receive major funding from the government and companies to deliever educatation/outreach packages and deliever. (www.appliedtheatre.co.nz)
Peter’s arts practice is based on his training with Dorothy Heathcote and Cecily O’Neill in London in the 80’s. He works largely with teacher/particapint in role, Mantle of the Expert and most importantly everyone being in the drama together, working as a group, to achieve and objective or a goal. Peter believes in the work set out by Heathcote and O’Neill and believes in the practice of educational drama to be in Heathcotes words, from the chapter Role-taking (1968) from the book Dorothy Heathcote collected writings on education and drama:
” Educational drama can be defined as having two significant aspects and aims. One of these we can define as ‘creative work’ the other as ‘coping work’. Both are significant areas of experience in developing person. A broad definition of educational drama is ‘role-taking’, either to understand a social situation more thoughuly or to experience imaginatively via identification in social situation.”
“Putting yourself in somebody elses shoes”
WORKING OUT THE DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES:
While at Peter’s we got to talking about dramatherapy and the work the I am doing with Paula in the special education school, because next week Peter in going into special education schools in west Auckland to lead drama in education workshops and both of us were curious of the differences. Peter began to question me which was very helpful as to finding these differences and similarities in dramatherapy and drama education and also there principils and there objectives. These are the sort of notes I cam up with at the time:
DRAMATHERAPY
More touchy feely anicdotial
(The Sesame approach)
Slade and Way, both originally
Performers/actors not academics.
Focus on the individual. Uses physical elements as well as noises and short phrases, of a specific character but not really being the character in role for longer that 5 seconds or so in the story.
How is the problem of the drama/story resolved?
The problem is resolved through the story itself rather than through the children as a group. More individual change and development rather than group.
In a session with Paula using the story of the Thunder God which is a chinnese story – the action of digging is used. Digging in the dramatherapy sense comprised of digging individually (Why are we digging, by digging what goal are we achieving?)
The physical attributes of learning is there but the inner questioning may not be there.
SMALLER GOALS……..
DRAMA IN EDUCATION
Means being in the drama working on creative drama methods such as hotseating, teacher in role, mantle of the expert etc.
Taking on the role of others to have a view and an understanding of the world we live in. In order to achieve a collective social change while working through problems in a group together.
Digging in drama in education would be that you would dig together in a group say pirates and your quest is to get treasure, you must dig deeper and harder (the children would take on the role of pirates working together to get the treasure.
BIGGER GOAL
The above are only my thought so far as i continue to work in my placement i develop my views and opinions and i will continue to present my thoughts on this topic in my blogs and in my report.